In another successful case against Anfi Group, the court found that the timeshare agreement was in perpetuity — meaning it did not specify an end date — and that it did not meet the minimum legal requirements expected of this type of contract.
Because the contract was open-ended and fell short of those requirements, the judge ruled the agreement null and void. As a result, the client was awarded £23,983 in compensation.
The total compensation included a doubled element of the amount paid, as the client had paid the full purchase price within the first three months. In this kind of case, the timing of payments can be significant when the court considers the appropriate award.
This decision is the latest example of a court finding that an Anfi timeshare contract in perpetuity can be unenforceable where key contractual requirements are not met — and of a compensation award being made on that basis.
