Another December has brought a double court win against Anfi Sales, with both claims heard at the San Bartolomé de Tirajana court in Las Palmas, Gran Canaria. The Las Palmas court considered the way the timeshare products had been documented and, in each case, found the Anfi sales contract was missing key information that should have been clearly set out for the purchasers.
In particular, the contracts did not include the minimum accommodation details required. That meant the paperwork did not clearly explain what had been bought and when the clients were entitled to use their timeshare. Where those essential details are absent, it can leave buyers without the clarity they need about usage rights, booking periods and the accommodation tied to the purchase.
As a result, the judge declared both Anfi contracts null and void. The court also ordered Anfi to make payments of £19,128 in one case and £26,048 in the other, reflecting the outcome of these two rulings in Las Palmas.
These back-to-back results add to a growing body of timeshare decisions where the court focuses closely on whether a contract explains the accommodation and usage terms properly. For anyone following Anfi timeshare cases, the key point in these rulings is that the judge did not accept vague or incomplete contract wording where customers should have been given clear, specific purchase and usage information.
Congratulations to the M1 Legal team on securing another strong outcome in court.
